![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Projects - 2006 Charrette Winners 1st PRIZE TEAM 27 - Université de Montréal Martine Laprise, Étienne Laplante-Courchesne 2nd PRIZE Ex aequo TEAM 12 - McGill University Rami Abou-Khalil, Lia Ruccolo, Anouck Lemarquis, Lawrence Siu, Marc-Antoine Chartier-Primeau TEAM 22 - Université de Montréal Marie-Ève Plante, Sarah Mustille, Oliya Girard, Dave Delarosbil, Sylvain Mailloux MENTIONS: TEAM 17 -Université de Montréal Nathalie Héroux, Gabrielle Nadeau, Olivier Jacques, Étienne Bernier TEAM 24 -Ryerson University Kevin Hutchinson, Scott Cairns, Kenneth Luk, Cristian Stefanescu TEAM 36 - UQAM Alexandra Arenes, Damien Boboc, Achille Bourdon, François Coquin, Anh Minh Ngo Thanks you and congratulations to all participants! |
Jury’s Comments, Inter-university Charrette 2006 President of the jury : Cécile Baird, architect, Atelier B.R.I.C. First Prize: Team 27 The members of the jury very much appreciated the fact that this visionary yet pragmatic project maintains a continuity with the site’s previous developmental phases. The team proposed a framework of public spaces, thoroughfares and squares forming landscapes connected to Montreal’s existing network. It seems evident to us that a neighbourhood could develop here, based on isolated monuments (silos) and a typical urban fabric (street grid). Second Prize (ex aequo): Team 12 The narrative character of this project immediately won over the jury. Rather than presenting a literal plan for the development of the site, the team offered a way of reflecting on the ongoing increase in urban density through a playful story and a highly poetic presentation. Second Prize (ex aequo): Team 22 This proposal’s fine model appealed to the sensibility and imagination of each one of us. The Peel basin site is infused with an ordered landscape, forming a framework or subdivision that would be built up progressively. Observers must guess at the shape and density of the future built environment; they must, so to speak, project their own vision onto the project. Honourable Mention: Team 36 This proposal’s excellent graphic quality very much impressed the jury. The analytic method and range of colour, as well as the notion of strewing containers about the site like so many “follies,” no doubt reference Tschumi’s Parc de la Villette in Paris. The idea of extending and superimposing neighbouring urban frameworks was particularly interesting. Honourable Mention: Team 17 This project stirred controversy among the members of the jury, as it adhered to neither the format nor the program prescribed. Nonetheless, it was very well presented. Although some judged the project, inspired by the site’s silo, to be impertinent, others appreciated its message as both a social and a spatial critique. Honourable Mention: Team 24 The majority of the jury’s members were won over by the quality of this proposal’s presentation panel. Using bright colours, the graphic layout of the virtual model shows bars that seem to be inspired by the forms of the neighbouring basins. However, the scale of the intervention was disturbing. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
|||||||